<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shut up. We&#8217;re trying to watch the news.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://x.painkiller.org/politics-etc/politics/shut-up-were-trying-to-watch-the-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://x.painkiller.org/politics-etc/politics/shut-up-were-trying-to-watch-the-news</link>
	<description>art is a single syllable word</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kristian</title>
		<link>http://x.painkiller.org/politics-etc/politics/shut-up-were-trying-to-watch-the-news/comment-page-1#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x.painkiller.org/?p=28#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I agree, but the answer isn't more government programs institutionalizing "fairness."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but the answer isn&#8217;t more government programs institutionalizing &#8220;fairness.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://x.painkiller.org/politics-etc/politics/shut-up-were-trying-to-watch-the-news/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x.painkiller.org/?p=28#comment-85</guid>
		<description>My point is that the "parity" we have achieved is just divisive, partisan hackery (on both sides), and what is lost is any sort of substantive conversation. This is a win win situation for the Rupert Murdoch's of the world, but I can't help thinking that us modest Americans are on the losing end of the battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that the &#8220;parity&#8221; we have achieved is just divisive, partisan hackery (on both sides), and what is lost is any sort of substantive conversation. This is a win win situation for the Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s of the world, but I can&#8217;t help thinking that us modest Americans are on the losing end of the battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristian</title>
		<link>http://x.painkiller.org/politics-etc/politics/shut-up-were-trying-to-watch-the-news/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 22:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x.painkiller.org/?p=28#comment-84</guid>
		<description>NPR as a source for "real" news?  Hmmmm... it seems to me that NPR is very much a left-leaning outit, as are the New York Times, LA Times, San Francisco Chronicle, et. al.  Yes, Fox news and talk radio are clearly biased to the right.  But almost all of print media and the other major television networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) are left leaning.  So why do we need a Fairness Doctrine?  The free market has provided parity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR as a source for &#8220;real&#8221; news?  Hmmmm&#8230; it seems to me that NPR is very much a left-leaning outit, as are the New York Times, LA Times, San Francisco Chronicle, et. al.  Yes, Fox news and talk radio are clearly biased to the right.  But almost all of print media and the other major television networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) are left leaning.  So why do we need a Fairness Doctrine?  The free market has provided parity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
